This guide addresses tourist crime, beginning by describing the problem and reviewing the factors that contribute to it. It then identifies a series of questions to help you analyze your local problem. Finally, it provides a number of measures your agency can take to address the problem and to evaluate responses. The guide addresses tourist crimes committed in the United States, although the information provided here will no doubt benefit those readers dealing with the problem abroad.
There are several problems related to crimes against tourists that may call for separate analyses and responses. These problems, which are beyond the scope of this guide, include
† See the POP Guide on Street Prostitution.
† See the POP Guide on Financial Crimes Against the Elderly.
† See the POP Guide on Burglary of Single-Family Houses.
† See the POP Guide on Robbery at Automated Teller Machines.
Understanding the factors that contribute to your problem will help you frame your own local analysis questions, determine good effectiveness measures, recognize key intervention points, and select appropriate responses.
Tourism is an interactive relationship among tourists, local businesses, and host governments and communities.1 It is the United States’ second largest service industry (after health care), and directly or indirectly supporting 204 million jobs,2 producing more than $100 billion in revenues,3 and drawing 57.2 million visitors to the nation each year.4 Growth in tourism, however, has also led to increased opportunities for, and incidences of, crime. Indeed, a long-established relationship exists between increases in crime and tourism; major economic crimes (e.g., robbery, burglary) in some highly popular tourism venues have a “similar season to tourism,”5 for several reasons. First, tourists are lucrative targets, since they typically carry large sums of money and other valuables. Second, tourists are vulnerable because they are more likely to be relaxed and off guard—and sometimes careless—while on vacation. Finally, tourists are often less likely to report crimes or to testify against suspects, wishing to avoid problems or a return trip.6 Tourist crimes generally involve one of several scenarios:
† See Assaults in and Around Bars, Guide No. 1 in this series.
It is worth noting that tourists may be the perpetrators, as well as the victims, of crime. The “tourist culture” can lessen tourists’ sense of responsibility. They may riot at sporting events, for example, or cause disturbances on aircraft. They may also solicit prostitutes, buy illegal drugs, or smuggle goods out of the country. Furthermore, terrorists may pretend to be tourists (to target legitimate ones).15
The information provided above is only a generalized description of the problem of crimes against tourists. You must combine the basic facts with a more specific understanding of your local problem. Analyzing the local problem will help you design a more effective response strategy.
Your agency’s capacity to identify tourist-related incidents in its records management system is a major factor in being able to ask the right questions and develop proper responses. It would be helpful if a standard, international definition specified who a tourist is, what constitutes a crime against a tourist, and how tourist crime records should be kept.16 Then police departments in tourist areas could record and analyze tourist crimes separately, and thus better understand victimization patterns.17 You should review your agency’s records management system to ensure there are uniform methods for reporting and classifying tourist crimes.18
Many tourist areas closely guard tourist crime data.19 To get an accurate picture of the problem, you may need to (1) thoroughly review offense reports to identity tourist-related crimes (computer-aided dispatching systems may be coded to tabulate such crimes); (2) conduct tourist surveys (e.g., through the local police, Chamber of Commerce, or hotels/motels) to determine the actual number of offenses; or (3) encourage businesses—including hotels and motels—to report crimes or other problems concerning tourists to the police.†
† See Disorder at Budget Motels in this series, for a discussion regarding motel reporting practices. [Full text]
Measurement allows you to determine to what degree your efforts have succeeded, and suggests how you might modify your responses if they are not producing the intended results. You should take measures of your problem before you implement responses, to determine how serious the problem is, and after you implement them, to determine whether they have been effective. Measurement will likely involve both quantitative (statistical) and qualitative (anecdotal) information. (For more detailed guidance on measuring effectiveness, see the companion guide to this series, Assessing Responses to Problems: An Introductory Guide for Police Problem-Solvers.)
You should be alert to the possibility that your responses to tourist crime might displace it, either geographically, to other types of crime, or to non-tourist victims. You should also be aware that your responses to tourist crime might reduce non-tourist-related crime, as well.
Your analysis of your local problem should give you a better understanding of the factors contributing to it. Once you have analyzed your local problem and established a baseline for measuring effectiveness, you should consider possible responses to the problem.
The following response strategies are drawn from a variety of research studies and police problem-solving efforts; several of them may apply to your community’s problem. It is critical that you tailor responses to local circumstances, and that you can justify each response based on reliable analysis. In most cases, an effective strategy will involve implementing several different responses. Law enforcement responses alone are seldom effective in reducing or solving the problem. Do not limit yourself to considering what police can do; give careful consideration to who else in your community shares responsibility for the problem and can help police better respond to it.
Unfortunately, there are few careful evaluations of tourist crime interventions. Much of what is recommended here is based on informed judgments about what is likely to be effective. More rigorous evaluations are needed.
† See “Overcoming Language Barriers: Solutions for Law Enforcement” PDF
† See Disorder at Budget Motels in this series, for further information about preventing crime and disorder in motels. [Full text]
You might also encourage hotels and motels to provide safety tips on their website or in-house cable TV channel.
† The police department is now called the Miami-Dade Police Department.
† See Robbery at Automated Teller Machines, Guide No. 8 in this series, for information about crime prevention at ATMs. [
Full text ]
† † See the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department’s website, at www.lvmpd.com, for an example of tourist safety information.
The following are some common safety tips that particularly pertain to tourists:
All tourist information should be available in the languages most commonly spoken by visitors to the area.
† The city of Wellington, New Zealand, runs a program called Walkwise that deploys trained civilian safety officers at all times in the city’s central business district. The officers act as ambassadors and work closely with police, intervening in low-level disorder problems and reporting more-serious offending.
† For an excellent discussion of various ways to safely move and handle large crowds of visitors through environmental design, see Shearing and Stenning (1997). [Full text]
The table below summarizes the responses to crimes against tourists, the mechanism by which they are intended to work, the conditions under which they ought to work best, and some factors you should consider before implementing a particular response. It is critical that you tailor responses to local circumstances, and that you can justify each response based on reliable analysis. In most cases, an effective strategy will involve implementing several different responses. Law enforcement responses alone are seldom effective in reducing or solving the problem.
| General Considerations for an Effective Strategy | ||||
| # | Response | How It Works | Works Best If... | Considerations |
| 1 | Working with the tourism industry to identify and address crime-related concerns | Increases the likelihood of tourist crime prevention by combining police and industry efforts | …the police know and can inform others about good safety practices used locally and elsewhere | Should promote good practice by police, tourism officials, and private business owners who cater to tourists; should not be limited to directing extra police patrols |
| 2 | Training police and private security staff to recognize and address tourist-related safety concerns | Enhances the ability of, and the confidence in, personnel to address the problem | …high-quality training programs are used, based on established, successful curricula | Costs to police agencies or local governments to develop/administer training |
| Specific Responses to Reduce Crimes Against Tourists | ||||
| # | Response | How It Works | Works Best If... | Considerations |
| 3 | Facilitating tourist victims’ testimony in criminal cases | Increases the likelihood of convicting offenders, and thus may deter potential offenders | …legislation provides funding for victims’ travel expenses, or for equipment for them to testify via teleconferencing | Increases costs to the local jurisdiction; may or may not result in conviction |
| 4 | Imposing additional taxes in tourist areas to support special security measures | Provides funding for enhanced security measures in tourist areas | …local government leaders and business owners are willing to pay the cost to improve the area and reduce tourist risks | Taxpayers may be reluctant to pay extra taxes if they believe police should assume the sole responsibility for safeguarding tourists |
| 5 | Encouraging hotels and motels to adopt practices that will reduce guest victimization | Reduces opportunities for tourists to be victimized in the first instance | …hotels/motels have a strong motivation to prevent crimes, and use knowledgeable personnel to determine needs and to install equipment | Implementation costs can be high; hotel/motel managers may be reluctant to raise concerns among guests about the potential for crime victimization |
| 6 | Offering rewards for information leading to the arrest and conviction of those who commit serious crimes against tourists | Increases the likelihood of convicting offenders, and thus may deter potential offenders | …offers of reward money are well publicized and sufficiently high to encourage those with information to come forward | Costs to fund the program (reward money, administrative costs, etc.) |
| 7 | Educating tourists to reduce their risk of victimization | Promotes safe practices among tourists | …tourist information is available in different languages | Costs of producing and disseminating the information |
| 8 | Increasing uniform patrols in tourist areas | Potentially deters offenders, and increases the likelihood that tourist crimes will be interrupted | …officers patrol high-risk locations | Requires a substantial commitment of personnel and other justice system resources |
| 9 | Deploying citizen patrols to supplement police patrols | Potentially deters offenders, and increases the likelihood that tourist crimes will be interrupted | …volunteers are properly trained, have instant communication access to police, and are conspicuously dressed | Costs of employing, training, and equipping citizen patrols |
| 10 | Conducting surveillance at high-risk locations | Enhances the ability of police to identify offenders, and potentially deters offenders | …cameras and/or officers surveil high-risk areas | Labor-intensive and costly to conduct; electronic surveillance equipment must be vigilantly monitored |
| 11 | Changing the physical environment to reduce opportunities for tourist crimes | Increases the difficulty of committing offenses | …the changes are tailored to the immediate environment’s particular risks | Requires a sophisticated understanding of the principles and methods of crime prevention through environmental design |
[1] McIntosh and Goeldner (1986).
[2] Brunt and Hambly (1999).
[3] Pelfrey (1998). [Full text]
[4] Smith (1999).
[5] See, for example, Harper (2001)[Full text]; Chesney-Lind and Lind (1986)[Full text]; McPheters and Stronge (1974).
[6] Fujii and Mak (1979).
[7] DeAlbuquerque and McElroy (1999). [Full text]
[8] Ferreira and Harmse (2000). [Full text]
[9] Harper (2001).[Full text]
[10] Ferreira and Harmse (2000). [Full text]
[11] Pizam and Mansfeld (1996).
[12] World Tourism Organization (1996).
[13] Flynn (1998).
[14] Schiebler, Crotts, and Hollinger, in Pizam and Mansfeld (1996), pp. 37–50. [Full text]
[15] Brunt and Hambly (1999).
[16] Pizam, Tarlow, and Bloom (1997).
[17] DeAlbuquerque and McElroy (1999). [Full text]
[18] Pizam and Mansfeld (1996).
[19] Pizam and Mansfeld (1996).
[20] Pizam, Tarlow, and Bloom (1997).
[21] Pizam, Tarlow, and Bloom (1997).
[22] Pizam, Tarlow, and Bloom (1997).
[23] Ruppel (n.d.).
[24] Florida Department of Law Enforcement (1996). [Full text]
[25] http://www.downtownnewark.com
[26] DeAlbuquerque and McElroy (1999). [Full text]
[27] Florida Department of Law Enforcement (1996). [Full text]
[28] Crotts (1996). [Full text]
[29] Crotts (1996). [Full text]
[30] Metro-Dade Police Department (1996). [Full text]
[31] Ishikawa (2002).
[32] Honolulu Police Department (1998). [Full text]
[33] Shearing and Stenning (1997). [Full text]
Barker, M., S. Page, and D. Meyer (2002). “Modeling Tourism Crime: The 2000 America’s Cup.” Annals of Tourism Research 29(3):762–782. [Full text]
Brunt, P., and Z. Hambly (1999). “Tourism and Crime: A Research Agenda.” Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal 1(2):25–36.
Chesney-Lind, M., and I. Lind (1986). “Visitors as Victims: Crimes Against Tourists in Hawaii.” Annals of Tourism Research 13:167–191. [Full text]
Crotts, J. (1996). “Theoretical Perspectives on Tourist Criminal Victimization.” Journal of Tourism Studies 7(1):2–9. [Full text]
DeAlbuquerque, K., and J. McElroy (1999). “Tourism and Crime in the Caribbean.” Annals of Tourism Research 26(1):968–984. [Full text]
Ferreira, S., and A. Harmse (2000). “Crime and Tourism in South Africa: International Tourists’ Perception and Risk.” South African Geographical Journal 82(2):80–85. [Full text]
Florida Department of Law Enforcement (1996). Visitor Crime in Florida: The Perception vs. the Reality. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Law Enforcement. [Full text]
Flynn, D. (1998). Defining the “Community” in Community Policing. Washington, D.C.: Police Executive Research Forum.
Fujii, E., and J. Mak (1980). “Tourism and Crime: Implications for Regional Development Policy.” Regional Studies 14:27–36.
Harper, D. (2001). “Comparing Tourists Crime Victimization.” Annals of Tourism Research 28(4):1053–1056. [Full text]
Honolulu Police Department (1998). “Herman Goldstein Award Nomination: District 4.” Submission to the Herman Goldstein Award for Excellence in Problem-Oriented Policing. [Full text]
Ishikawa, S. (2002). “Theft Poses Challenge for Hawaii’s Tourism.”Honolulu Advertiser, November 18.
McIntosh, R., and C. Goeldner (1986). Tourism Principles, Practices, Philosophies. New York: Wiley.
McPheters, L., and W. Stronge (1974). “Crime as an Environmental Externality of Tourism: Miami, Florida.” Land Economics 50(2):288–292.
Metro-Dade Police Department (1996). “Tourist-Oriented Police Program.” Submission for the Herman Goldstein Award for Excellence in Problem-Oriented Policing. [Full text]
Pelfrey, W. (1998). “Tourism and Crime: A Preliminary Assessment of the Relationship of Crime to the Number of Visitors at Selected Sites.” International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 22(2):293–304. [Full text]
Pizam, A., and Y. Mansfeld (eds.) (1996). Tourism, Crime, and International Security Issues. Chichester, England; New York: Wiley. [Full text of chapter 14]
Pizam, A., P. E. Tarlow, and J. Bloom (1997). “Making Tourists Feel Safe: Whose Responsibility Is It?” Journal of Travel Research (Summer): 23-28.
Ruppel, G. (n.d.). “States Streamline Thief Prosecution.” http://more.abcnews.go.com/sections/2020/2020/2020friday_001103_touristscams_feature.html#sidebar
Shearing, C., and P. Stenning (1997). “From the Panopticon to Disney World: The Development of Discipline.” In R. Clarke (ed.), Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies (2nd ed.). Guilderland, N.Y.: Harrow and Heston. [Full text]
Sherman, L., P. Gardin, and M. Buerger (1989). “Hot Spots of Predatory Crime: Routine Activities and the Criminology of Place.” Criminology 27(1):27–55.
Smith, G. (1999). “Toward a United States Policy on Traveler Safety and Security: 1980–2000.” Journal of Travel Research 38(1):62–65.
World Tourism Organization (1996). Tourist Safety and Security: Practical Measures for Destinations. Madrid, Spain: World Tourism Organization.
Important!
The quality and focus of these submissions vary considerably. With the exception of those submissions selected as winners or finalists, these documents are unedited and are reproduced in the condition in which they were submitted. They may nevertheless contain useful information or may report innovative projects.
Airport District Tourist Oriented Police Department, Metro-Dade Police Department (Metro-Dade, FL, US), 1996
District 4 Thefts from Rental Vehicles, Honolulu Police Department, 1998
Operation Safe Streets, Honolulu Police Department, 1998
Policing Boise's Downtown Entertainment District, Boise Police Department, 2008
Project Centurion [Goldstein Award Winner], Isle of Man Constabulary (British Isles, UK), 2005
Reclaiming the 'Street of Shame': A Problem Oriented Solution to Vancouver's Entertainment District, Vancouver Police Department, 2009
Safer Swansea: Call Time on Violent Crime, South Wales Police (South Wales, UK), 2008
TOPS: Tourist Oriented Policing, Jackson Police Department, 2007
Tourist Victimization Prevention Project, Honolulu Police Department, 1998
You may order free bound copies in any of three ways:
Online: Department of Justice COPS Response Center
Email: askCopsRC@usdoj.gov
Phone: 800-421-6770 or 202-307-1480
Allow several days for delivery.
Send an e-mail with a link to this guide.
* required
Error sending email. Please review your enteries below.